For-profit medicine

The money was already in the practice

A private clinic came in asking a straightforward question: how much more should we spend on marketing to grow the patient base?

The answer surprised them.

The aha moment

The clinic was not under-marketed. It was under-utilized. Capacity was running at roughly 65 percent, with gaps concentrated mid-week and in the first half of the month. A utilization model showed that moving from 65 to 80 percent utilization was worth more in annual revenue than doubling the marketing budget, at no increase in acquisition cost.

A second look at the same clinic found three separate leaks. None looked dramatic on its own. Inquiry-to-booking conversion was dropping roughly a third of inbound leads. Cancellations and no-shows were absorbing another 12 percent of booked capacity. Fewer than one in five visits ended with a rebook. Because each lever works on the same patient base, fixing them compounds. The combined revenue impact was more than three times the sum of the individual fixes, and almost none of it required additional marketing spend.

The owner's reaction: "So the money was already in the building."

Most of it was.

What the diagnostic looked at

Utilization by day and week. Inquiry-to-booking conversion. Cancellation and no-show rate. Rebook rate. Ad spend efficiency.

What shifted

The conversation moved from how to get more patients in, to how to stop losing the ones already coming.

← Back to Field Notes

Subscribe to The Public Goods

Field notes, framework development, and posts on strengthening Canadian institutions. Free to read.

Subscribe →